{"id":236,"date":"2026-06-09T04:39:39","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T04:39:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236"},"modified":"2026-06-09T04:39:39","modified_gmt":"2026-06-09T04:39:39","slug":"starmers-cynical-child-safety-crusade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236","title":{"rendered":"Starmer’s cynical child-safety crusade"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Won\u2019t somebody think of the children? When they choose to, Left-wingers are <\/span>more than capable of noticing<\/span> the emotive force of this appeal, and its power as a stalking-horse for political ends. But this week, as Keir Starmer pried the door to full government digital censorship several inches further open, most seemed determined to stay focused only on the narrow question of keeping children safe.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Spycraft will decide Iran\u2019s fate<\/a><\/p>\n

To this end, we are told, Starmer has announced that digital platforms have a three-month period in which to implement measures preventing under-16s from taking or sending or receiving nude photos. As things stand, Apple and Google have some age-verification features but these don\u2019t work across everything on the platform. The Government has threatened to legislate if these measures are not made more robust.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In response, much of the reaction so far has <\/span>focused<\/span> on how this actually isn\u2019t enough censorship, and <\/span>won\u2019t someone think of the children<\/span>? The safetyists may yet get their wish: further <\/span>restrictions are expected<\/span> next week, purportedly also addressed at protecting kids. The new rules will clamp down on infinite scroll, \u201charmful\u201d websites and perhaps also the design of digital content algorithms. Conservative MP Laura Trott immediately <\/span>declared<\/span> that this wouldn\u2019t be enough censorship either.<\/span><\/p>\n

As the mother of a tween girl, you\u2019d think I would be cheering this all on. Yes, I do worry about keeping my daughter safe as the shark-filled digital waters lap at her ankles. But I also think these proposals stink, are being rolled out in bad faith by a Poundland tyranny whose leaders are deeply afraid of their own citizens, and should be fought tooth-and-nail precisely on the grounds of thinking of our children.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

As regards thinking of my own child, so far I\u2019ve just embraced the fact that being a parent means saying \u201cno\u201d sometimes, and resigned myself to being the villain on this issue. But in the macro-debate now occurring over kids and social media, what\u2019s striking is that parental authority of this elementary kind doesn\u2019t seem to figure at all. The actors in question are the Government and tech companies. Inasmuch as kids feature, it\u2019s as a groom-able, corruptible, harm-able but otherwise passive blob, to be proactively Kept Safe by Big Government.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

I guess a government that <\/span>doesn\u2019t think its citizens capable<\/span> of remembering to give their own kids breakfast, before sending them to school, is not going to treat those same parents as capable of managing their kids\u2019 YouTube habits. And I\u2019ll grant that there\u2019s a grim pragmatism at work here. Based on observation of my daughter\u2019s peer group, only a minority of parents seem to enforce more than minimal restrictions on screen use, or to spend much time investigating the platforms and content their children are exposed to.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

But if, as seems obviously the case well beyond this particular policy area, the government operates from a basic assumption that parents can\u2019t be trusted to play any substantive role in raising their own kids, it follows that the only body with the power to intervene in their social media consumption must be (you guessed it) the government. And so we get to the crux of the matter: <\/span>how<\/span><\/i> is this to be achieved?<\/span><\/p>\n

In the case of the ban on sending nudes, it appears this would mean forcing every device to include software that preemptively scans all images, and stops any being sent that the AI image scanner has identified as a bit nude-ish. To deactivate this, the device user would have to verify his or her age. So, again: how is age verification to be achieved? At the very least it would require a mandatory ID check when setting up a device or computer, perhaps by scanning a passport or driving license. Starmer has also announced he\u2019s <\/span>rolling out \u201coptional\u201d digital ID<\/span>, so presumably he intends this to be used for verification too.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In other words, preventing kids from sending nudes would in practice mean everyone must accept the ubiquitous presence of software that automatically scans every image on every device, and censors according to its own algorithms. Which you don\u2019t control. Then, too, anyone sharing images deemed \u201csensitive\u201d by this software must prove they are over 18. And this means showing an official ID \u2014 perhaps, in time, a digital one \u2014 which in turn means forfeiting anonymity.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Some might perhaps argue: so what? Of <\/span>course<\/span><\/i> the software is only going to be employed in the narrow context of kids being groomed to share nudes. And this kind of sexual exploitation is indisputably very bad. Am I on the side of perverts and pedophiles? This was <\/span>the line taken by Technology Secretary Peter Kyle<\/span>, when Nigel Farage raised concerns over the Online Safety Act, on free speech grounds.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Why the US sucks at soccer<\/a><\/p>\n

More fundamentally, though: why do we need these government mandates at all when parents can already enable this feature for their kids <\/span>via the Screen Time settings<\/span> in existing devices? Why, indeed, would Britain be going full-steam ahead with further restrictions, when the reporting so far from Australia is that the ban there <\/span>isn\u2019t even protecting kids at all<\/span>?<\/span><\/p>\n

The answer, I\u2019m afraid, is that Starmer instinctively wants more control over the internet <\/span>because he\u2019s afraid of the people he is supposed to govern, plus they use the internet to laugh at him. <\/span>And I can see how that would make sense from his point of view. Britain in 2026 really is a sullen, fractious tinderbox, with a population growing more visibly tribalized by the week, in a process that really is being accelerated by social media.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

This angry national mood derailed his premiership almost immediately, after the Southport atrocity, and erupted again last week over the role played by police \u201canti-racism\u201d in the death of Henry Nowak. The perception of institutional animus against white Britons has propagated well beyond professional race-baiters, to the point where my husband was quizzed on a business trip to Europe last week by normally apolitical business colleagues. What on earth is going on in Britain, they wanted to know?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Given all this, I don\u2019t exactly blame Starmer for seeking to tighten his grip on the only aspects of the country he understands: the dimension of words, and that of rules. Perhaps he genuinely believes that stopping people talking about their political discontents is the same thing as making the discontents themselves go away. And certainly if you wanted greater powers to control what people say, Protecting Kids would be a good way to get people to grant you those powers.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In the case of the Online Safety Act, for example, never mind how Peter Kyle insulted Farage: Farage was right about the Act\u2019s effect on free speech. Critics <\/span>argue<\/span> that it\u2019s not even doing a good job of keeping kids safe; meanwhile, it\u2019s proving effective at stifling speech inconvenient to the regime. From <\/span>satirical posts about Keir Starmer<\/span> to <\/span>actual speeches delivered in Parliament<\/span>, the resulting perverse (or, if you prefer, just oppressive) speech restrictions have generated a rolling scandal since the bill became law in 2025. Given how swiftly its promise of protecting kids from porn mutated into a catch-all device for protecting the Government from mockery and criticism, a tool that scans every image you send would surely be similarly repurposed.<\/span><\/p>\n

As for anyone who still blithely insists that showing ID is a small price to pay for saying what you like: let\u2019s not forget that<\/span> British police forces made almost 10,000 arrests in 2025 for social media posts. How much would they relish<\/span> a tool that gave them the real name and address of everyone who\u2019s ever \u201cstirred up division\u201d with a photo or video?<\/span><\/p>\n

So won\u2019t somebody think of the children? I don\u2019t think anyone here is really thinking of the children. I don\u2019t even buy that Jess Phillips, who <\/span>recently resigned<\/span> in protest at digital censorship not being implemented, is thinking of the children. This is, after all, the same Jess Phillips who was<\/span> accused of trying to water down<\/span> a national inquiry into the sexual abuse of girls, including in her own constituency, by majority-Pakistani rape gangs, by expanding its scope to meaninglessness. In other words: someone more than capable of turning a blind eye to the safety of vulnerable children, when doing otherwise might <\/span>endanger her wafer-thin majority<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nor do I think that the Americans already weighing in to oppose Starmer\u2019s digital censorship are exactly thinking of the children either. The US interest in this issue is surely partly cultural, but it\u2019s also about maintaining control of the West\u2019s digital infrastructure, relative to Russia and China\u2019s competing digital spheres of influence, and latterly also against <\/span>noises from the EU<\/span> about forging its own brand of \u201ctech sovereignty\u201d. Given all this, should Starmer\u2019s three-month deadline for voluntary compliance expire and Labour follow through on the threat of legislating on censorship, we can expect robust pushback from the USA \u2014 to ends perhaps only somewhat aligned with the interests of the British people.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

But even those who don\u2019t care about the geopolitics should look at these proposals, and <\/span>actually <\/span><\/i>think of our children. Laws that empower parents; sure. Perhaps even rules restricting under-16s to \u201cdumb phones\u201d. But a mandatory image-scanning backdoor for the Government, on every phone, which you can only unlock by giving up anonymity? Perhaps you\u2019ve been shamed by Peter Kyle, or terrified by Laura Trott, into thinking we should assent to this so our children can enjoy freedom from sexting. But the freedom we should actually be thinking about, for children, is the freedom <\/span>to <\/span><\/i>speak, to think \u2014 and perhaps in time to <\/span>o<\/span>rganize, and liberate the nation from our useless, odious technocratic tyrants.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Can America ever escape race?<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Won\u2019t somebody think of the children? When they choose to, Left-wingers are more than capable of noticing the emotive force of this appeal, and its power as a stalking-horse for political ends. But this week, as Keir Starmer pried the door to full government digital censorship several inches further open, most seemed determined to stay […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":235,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[85],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-censorship"],"yoast_head":"\nStarmer's cynical child-safety crusade - \u0421ity Flow Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Starmer's cynical child-safety crusade - \u0421ity Flow Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Won\u2019t somebody think of the children? When they choose to, Left-wingers are more than capable of noticing the emotive force of this appeal, and its power as a stalking-horse for political ends. But this week, as Keir Starmer pried the door to full government digital censorship several inches further open, most seemed determined to stay […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u0421ity Flow Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-09T04:39:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4\"},\"headline\":\"Starmer’s cynical child-safety crusade\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T04:39:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236\"},\"wordCount\":1667,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Censorship\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236\",\"name\":\"Starmer's cynical child-safety crusade - \u0421ity Flow Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T04:39:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp\",\"width\":1568,\"height\":1110},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=236#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Starmer’s cynical child-safety crusade\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u0421ity Flow Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Starmer's cynical child-safety crusade - \u0421ity Flow Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Starmer's cynical child-safety crusade - \u0421ity Flow Journal","og_description":"Won\u2019t somebody think of the children? When they choose to, Left-wingers are more than capable of noticing the emotive force of this appeal, and its power as a stalking-horse for political ends. But this week, as Keir Starmer pried the door to full government digital censorship several inches further open, most seemed determined to stay […]","og_url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236","og_site_name":"\u0421ity Flow Journal","article_published_time":"2026-06-09T04:39:39+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4"},"headline":"Starmer’s cynical child-safety crusade","datePublished":"2026-06-09T04:39:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236"},"wordCount":1667,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp","articleSection":["Censorship"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236","url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236","name":"Starmer's cynical child-safety crusade - \u0421ity Flow Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-09T04:39:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/57b5422b4b040a61e7ad6f007ceb3b24.webp","width":1568,"height":1110},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=236#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Starmer’s cynical child-safety crusade"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/","name":"\u0421ity Flow Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/cityflowjournal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=236"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/235"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}