{"id":19,"date":"2026-05-22T18:33:17","date_gmt":"2026-05-22T18:33:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19"},"modified":"2026-05-22T18:33:17","modified_gmt":"2026-05-22T18:33:17","slug":"alasdair-macintyre-was-right-all-along","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19","title":{"rendered":"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>\u201cThe project of providing a rational vindication of morality had decisively failed,\u201d wrote Alasdair MacIntyre in <em>After Virtue<\/em> (1981). Enlightenment philosophers like Immanuel Kant had attempted to justify rationally what was effectively Christian morality. But, despite titanic efforts, they hadn\u2019t succeeded. The result, as MacIntyre described it, was that the morality of Western Enlightenment culture lacked any public, shared rationale or justification. Philosophy, therefore, had lost its central role in culture, becoming a marginal, narrowly academic subject.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=17\">Can Andy Burnham save my town?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>That philosophy has a marginal role, even in the academy, is undoubtedly true in the West. But <em>After Virtue <\/em>doesn\u2019t just examine what MacIntyre saw as the exhausted political traditions and moral confusions of liberal individualist Western societies. It also tries to offer an alternative, grounded in an idea of human essence and purpose, of the good life, inherited from the philosophy of Aristotle and largely, as MacIntyre saw it, abandoned.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, in this book, MacIntyre is trying to change the world. He does so in a way that has particular resonance today, even a year after his death. His endeavor, in <em>After Virtue, <\/em>is to push humanity in a different direction \u2014 sometimes referred to as a \u201cpost-liberal\u201d one \u2014 and, in a sense, to go backwards, to recover something lost through the turn to Protestantism and Jansenist Catholicism. You don\u2019t find much that even vaguely resembles this in modern philosophy, characterized as it is largely by pedantic quibbling and unreadable obscurantism.<\/p>\n<p>The critique that MacIntyre presents also informs his alternative. He argues that Western mankind became morally homeless by abandoning the foundations of Aristotelian morality in community and <em>arete <\/em>\u2014 excellence in one\u2019s work. This Aristotelian morality does still live on, but only as a sort of remnant, being found for example in distaste for \u201cdysfunctional\u201d individuals or institutions which fail to serve any useful purpose. But it rarely carries the day.<\/p>\n<p>Its abandonment exposes us to the claims of untutored human nature, for which there are no ethics, no enduring standards and little conception of\u00a0 excellence in and of itself. In this context, other types of moral assertion tend to prevail, generally based around ideas of equality and equity which tend to be suspicious of achievement. But these moral assertions often seem inappropriate \u2014 rewarding dysfunctional and even illegal behaviors.<\/p>\n<p>One example would be the current arguments surrounding illegal migration in Britain. Our moral discussions on such topics typically go around in circles of assertion and counter-assertion. The state and other conforming institutions try to enforce a consensus, invoking Christian-style moral sentiments\u00a0 like \u201ckindness\u201d and \u201ccompassion\u201d. But these attempts don\u2019t convince \u2014 and indeed, often appear to be attacks on other kinds of moral sentiment, say, based on ideas of deserving versus not-deserving. Meanwhile we find the \u201charm\u201d of John Stuart Mill\u2019s \u201charm principle\u201d \u2014 that individuals should be free to act just as long as they don\u2019t harm others \u2014\u00a0 expanded and exploited. Anything disliked is asserted to be harmful, thereby turning the harm principle into a rationale for preventing freedom when in fact, it was meant to facilitate it.<\/p>\n<p>There is an unreality to a lot of this cod-Christian, equity-centered moral assertion and its opposition. Both appear disconnected: sometimes futile; sometimes open to exploitation by the powerful. Moral statements about right and wrong still project moral passion. But the aims and ambitions those passions embody die on contact with the real world. Immigration activists preach compassion to refugees, but the migrants they seek to help hardly meet a compassionate world, trapped as they are between bureaucracy on the one hand and criminal gangs on the other. Those who wish to \u201cStop the Boats\u201d meanwhile find themselves talking into a void. MacIntyre says: \u201cWe possess indeed simulacra of morality, we continue to use many of the key expressions. But we have \u2014 very largely, if not entirely \u2014 lost our comprehension, both theoretical and practical, of morality.\u201d Nothing works, nothing improves \u2014 and our divisions embed themselves more and more over time.<\/p>\n<p>MacIntyre suggests that the government\u2019s inability to express a moral consensus makes patriotism, which he sees as a virtue, no longer possible like it once was. Western governments appear merely as means to impose \u201ca bureaucratized unity on society\u201d. As a result, they struggle to mobilize collective commitment. The nature of political obligation itself \u201cbecomes systematically unclear.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Our customary way out of this state of confusion is to fall into a pervading cynicism, MacIntyre tells us, reflexively dismissing moral statements from others as mere projections of self-interest. This cynicism gathers itself into a theoretical approach that he called \u201cemotivism\u201d and which sees self-serving, arbitrary motives behind others\u2019 moral utterances, exposing the very idea of morality to routine denunciations of hypocrisy.<\/p>\n<p>MacIntyre saw emotivism in everyone from Evangelicals to the Bloomsbury Group, Sartre and Nietzsche, and the liberal rights theorist John Rawls. Freud\u2019s \u201csuperego\u201d is another example. This conceptualizes an arbitrary, irrational eye of society that controls our actions via conscience, preventing us from being free. Emotivism coheres into a reflexive refutation of inherited morality, treating existing social bonds as oppressive. But the alternative it presents, of self-realization \u2014 the individual creating their own values \u2014 only leads us into more confusion as individual examples are unmasked in turn and rejected. And so we go around again, propelling ourselves into a brighter future only to refute it.<\/p>\n<p>As MacIntyre presents it in <em>After Virtue<\/em>, emotivism is the dominant philosophical standpoint of our times. As with previous moral worldviews, it finds itself embodied through characters who morally legitimize certain forms of behavior. While in past times the public school schoolmaster, explorer and engineer furnished such ideals, MacIntyre says, nowadays the function of emotivism is fulfilled by the archetypes of the rich aesthete, the bureaucratic expert, the therapist and the protestor.<\/p>\n<p>We might think of DEI as a sort of culmination of the emotivist spirit. For it is demonstrative and assertive, placing all wrongness outside itself and the groups it sponsors. It operates very much in the moral register. And it brings at least three of those archetypes together: wielding expert authority via the law-like generalizations of critical social science; protesting against the oppressive existing reality decreed by this science; and prescribing the overturning of existing functional society in order to fix it.<\/p>\n<p>For the emotivist, MacIntyre says, moral agency is located in the \u201cin the self and not in social roles or practices.\u201d That individual self can pass judgment on the world \u2014 and can freely reject it. The emotivist perspective is universal and abstract and protected from criticism. It is apart from the world \u2014 at least until it starts to shape the world itself, at which point it finds itself assailed variously for cynicism and hypocrisy. And so we go around again.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=15\">The joy of Jilly Cooper\u2019s naked snobbery<\/a><\/p>\n<p>MacIntyre\u2019s alternative, Aristotelian, version of morality seems strange and counter-intuitive to the Western individualist mind. Bound up in social roles and the work we do, it does not exist in a walled-off individual self. It is not purely our own. MacIntyre uses the example of a sea-captain to justify it, showing that, in his role, the sea-captain should do whatever good sea-captains do. At least some moral agency is to be found in him being functionally effective in his work rather than in some sort of inner essence of goodness.<\/p>\n<p>MacIntyre uses the idea of the \u201cpractice\u201d to articulate this perspective further, explaining it as a \u201ccoherent and complex form of socially established cooperative human activity through which goods internal to that form of activity are realized\u201d. In this sense, kicking a football isn\u2019t a practice, but the game of football is. Planting turnips isn\u2019t, but farming is. Bricklaying isn\u2019t, but architecture or housebuilding is. To enter into a practice is \u201cto subject my own attitudes, choices, preferences and tastes to the standards which currently and partially define the practice\u201d \u2014 standards which change over time through a continuous process of critique and improvement. Painting and music qualify, since they are long-term traditions with standards that evolve over time; so does academic work like physics, chemistry and the study and teaching of history.<\/p>\n<p>There is contrast here with our conventional utilitarian way of seeing things, for which the point of work is to achieve external goods \u2014 that is, work as a means for achieving separate ends. MacIntyre doesn\u2019t dismiss such things, but focuses also on the \u201cinternal\u201d goods of the practice, on maintaining and extending standards, which in turn requires the presence of virtues like justice, courage and honesty. For this perspective, your moral essence is to be found not in statement-making nor in abstract ideas about who you are, but rather attached to what you do \u2014 and whether this reflects the virtues of the practice. In this view, a sea-captain is no more virtuous for striving to ensure his crew is diverse.<\/p>\n<p>The virtues help protect the integrity of practices against the acquisitiveness of institutions. But practices require institutions to protect and nurture them. When we consider the decline of institutions like the Civil Service and BBC, we might see it in MacIntyre\u2019s framing, as reflecting a discarding of the virtues in favor of a sort of moralistic self-promotion.<\/p>\n<p>Is there a possible political philosophy in all of this?<\/p>\n<p>John Gray, perhaps our greatest current political philosopher, dismissed<em> After Virtue<\/em> in a <em>New Statesman<\/em> article soon after MacIntyre\u2019s death a year ago, suggesting that, as \u201can avowed critique of the modern world\u201d, it offered little useful guidance for modern urban-industrial societies. \u201cReading the book when it first appeared in 1981, I was struck by its political thinness,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>This seems unfair. MacIntyre\u2019s account of virtues and practices applies to modern industrial societies as much as any other society, embracing as it does science and improvement as part of a continual process of criticism and critique. Gray\u2019s account, accusing MacIntyre of \u201cpursuing an imaginary prelapsarian idyll\u201d, appears to be at least partly influenced by a torrid four-hour exchange they once had in an Oxford college garden.<\/p>\n<p>I, at least, found the book to be original and refreshing. It also offers a contrast to the reflexive pessimism that Gray falls into. It taps into our confusion about morality. But it also offers an alternative, and strangely practical vision, based on a deeper, more meaningful conception of work. Under MacIntyre\u2019s idea of practices, work is essential to human flourishing, giving us meaning and purpose, a role and status in our community, something we can be expert in and work to improve. This emerges as a different way of looking at morality, assigning moral value away from judgment-making and towards making a contribution through our actions.<\/p>\n<p>There is plenty to question about this vision. Applying such an idea to the low-paid drudgery of much work is not straightforward. But giving extra substance and recognition to work that is \u201csocially useful\u201d, in Mervyn King\u2019s phrase, like street cleaning and caring for the elderly, is surely well within the bounds of our imagination.<\/p>\n<p>It is also easy to imagine \u201cpractices\u201d being employed to prop up unjust and oppressive regimes. But on the other side, you could argue that the integration of practices into the workplace could be transformative in a good way, infusing both capitalism and the state with a new spirit, infused with the virtues. There is hope here, possibility, surely a sine qua non for any democratic politics.<\/p>\n<p>In a postscript included in a later edition of <em>After Virtue<\/em>, MacIntyre admitted that the book\u2019s argument is underpowered in certain aspects. Its confrontation with modern moral confusions is certainly limited, having little to say about sexual morality for example.<\/p>\n<p>The book\u2019s value can be found precisely in application. MacIntyre\u2019s analysis offers both critique of what has gone wrong and a route back to what may be made right again. Under his framing, such things as media production, academia, housebuilding and architecture, town planning, war-fighting, crime-fighting, public cleanliness and sport might all be thought of as practices to which standards of excellence apply over and above the assertion of moral supremacy. Certainly, the idea of practices runs counter to the promotion of self that we find so widespread in institutional life nowadays, which divert attention and resources away from delivery.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, far from being politically thin, <em>After Virtue<\/em> appears to open up a deep and rich seam of applications. As an account of work, it applies equally to public and private sectors. And, encompassing these two sometimes antagonistic sectors, it might just confer on us a practical theory of state and society: a political philosophy, requiring collective political action to implement in all areas where work matters. It ought to be an ideal prompt for the think-tank world.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=14\">How Churchill\u2019s art saved the West<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe project of providing a rational vindication of morality had decisively failed,\u201d wrote Alasdair MacIntyre in After Virtue (1981). Enlightenment philosophers like Immanuel Kant had attempted to justify rationally what was effectively Christian morality. But, despite titanic efforts, they hadn\u2019t succeeded. The result, as MacIntyre described it, was that the morality of Western Enlightenment culture [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anniversary"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along - \u0421ity Flow Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along - \u0421ity Flow Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u201cThe project of providing a rational vindication of morality had decisively failed,\u201d wrote Alasdair MacIntyre in After Virtue (1981). Enlightenment philosophers like Immanuel Kant had attempted to justify rationally what was effectively Christian morality. But, despite titanic efforts, they hadn\u2019t succeeded. The result, as MacIntyre described it, was that the morality of Western Enlightenment culture [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u0421ity Flow Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-22T18:33:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"643\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"428\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4\"},\"headline\":\"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-22T18:33:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19\"},\"wordCount\":2150,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Anniversary\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19\",\"name\":\"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along - \u0421ity Flow Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-22T18:33:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp\",\"width\":643,\"height\":428},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?p=19#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u0421ity Flow Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cityflowjournal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along - \u0421ity Flow Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along - \u0421ity Flow Journal","og_description":"\u201cThe project of providing a rational vindication of morality had decisively failed,\u201d wrote Alasdair MacIntyre in After Virtue (1981). Enlightenment philosophers like Immanuel Kant had attempted to justify rationally what was effectively Christian morality. But, despite titanic efforts, they hadn\u2019t succeeded. The result, as MacIntyre described it, was that the morality of Western Enlightenment culture [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19","og_site_name":"\u0421ity Flow Journal","article_published_time":"2026-05-22T18:33:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":643,"height":428,"url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4"},"headline":"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along","datePublished":"2026-05-22T18:33:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19"},"wordCount":2150,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp","articleSection":["Anniversary"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19","url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19","name":"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along - \u0421ity Flow Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp","datePublished":"2026-05-22T18:33:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d355bdd922fb3150fceaeb8981665a35.webp","width":643,"height":428},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?p=19#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Alasdair MacIntyre was right all along"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/","name":"\u0421ity Flow Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/eb5442f0ad6aa87f0eddf619a8d0abc4","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/cityflowjournal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cityflowjournal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}